CONCLUSION & EVALUATION OF THE METHOD
EVALUATION OF THE METHOD:
We think that the method contain three key parts that every method should have: Clear instructions, nice statements and easy comprehension; so it was easy understood. So we do not really think that the method needs any correction, except some things such as how it suppose that we can measure exactly the increment of ml in the capillary because we can have a mistake and place it 1 ml or 2 ml higher at the ruler above the 0. We cannot measure exactly with a ruler and it was good point to take a lot of results and the make an average. A possible solution of what I said before can be drawing at the capillary the ml measurements and we could maybe have more exact results.Also we can find some other solutions such as taking a photo or simply repeat more times the experiment to have a more accurate average. But actually, everything was clear understood.
CONCLUSION:
A general conclusion about this experiment is that it was an experiment that was very repetitive, we did not have to do anything interesting, in other words, we just only had to introduce a capillary in a substance and measure the ml increased, however, also we have to say the good things, and is that it was an easy experiment and because it was short, we finished the experiment very quickly and that lead us some spare/free time to start the lab report.
My definition of the experiment would be: Boring but short and easy.